Behind the statistics on draft evasion lies not a lack of motivation, but a deeper societal concern. Fear for one’s life and distrust in the system shape people’s decisions far more strongly than slogans or rhetoric. The response to this challenge depends not on messaging, but on real changes — in training, equipment, and military management.
Research findings
*Respondents could select up to three answers from the proposed options.
58.8% cite fear of death or serious injury as a reason for avoiding military service.
49.6% point to distrust in military leadership and fear that new recruits will be treated as “cannon fodder.”
What this means
Where fear dominates, abstract appeals are ineffective — people need clear rules, proper training, and genuine support. Where distrust is decisive, transparency, clear procedures, and accountability become critically important.
What should be taken into account
An effective response to draft evasion depends on improving the quality of the system itself, not merely increasing control or pressure. In the context of a prolonged war, society expects a shift from heroic rhetoric toward professionalism within the Armed Forces of Ukraine, clearly defined service rules, and guaranteed social protections for service members and their families.
